|
| Rated: R |
2000 |
Color |
Time 90 mins |
| Starring:
Ryo Ishibashi, Eihi Shiina , Tetsu Sawaki , Jun Kunimura , Renji Ishibashi , Miyuki Matsuda , Toshie Negishi , Ren Osugi , Shigeru Saiki , Ken Mitsuishi , Yuriko Hirooka , Fumiyo Kohinata |
| Directed
by: Takashi Miike |
| Written
by: Daisuke Tengan |
| Based
on the novel by: Ryu Murakami |
| Music:
Kôji Endô |
| Movie
Co.: Film Forum |
|
|
Critique
Section
|
|
HugeReviews.com's
Official Rating System:
Pathetic
Wimpy
Solid Super
HUGE
|
| HugeReviews.com's
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
| Movie
Stills: Photos |
Links |
Awards |
|
|
|

|
VHS
|
DVD
|
|
The Audition Store
THE TAKASHI MIIKE COLLECTION
|
HugeReviews.com
Reviews:
|
Disturbingly
Surreal Reality: Audition
by Christian De Matteo
Super
The phrase, “Not for those with weak
stomachs” has become, like most other things, an empty
marketing phrase meant to illicit girlish giggles from men and
statements like, “Dude, that’s sick, I gotta see it” for
the sake of machismo.
It’s a shame that the phrase has gone
that way, because Takashi Miike’s film Audition,
warrants it like few other films I’ve seen before.
The last time I was this disgusted by a film was when I
watched Peter Greenaway’s The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and
Her Lover. The
difference is that The Cook disgusted me in total; Audition
disgusted and enthralled me.
This review is rather long, so forgive me,
but the film deserves the time.
I bought Audition on a whim, knowing
nothing at all about the director or the film, but having heard
that the “last twenty minutes was like a sledgehammer to the
stomach.” That
sounded interesting (and a lovely description), and I’ve been
trying to up my foreign film knowledge, so here was the
opportunity.
While waiting to receive the DVD, suddenly
Miike’s name started appearing everywhere, and I kept hearing
more and more about this director and his astoundingly twisted
visions and stories. I
became even more intrigued.
I wanted to see not only the film I was getting, but also
Ichi the Killer, for which I’ve heard raves.
So last night I watched my copy of
Audition… and as the credits rolled I let out a big, hearty,
“Daf*ck?” I had no idea what had happened in that stomach sledging last
twenty minutes of the film.
Now, luckily, the DVD has a commentary only on the last
thirty minutes, but I haven’t yet watched it, wanting to
review only the film. I’ve
been thinking about it ever since.
Yes, the film is absolutely disturbing as
hell. Yes, the film
is gross in a few parts and absolutely disgusting in others.
Yes, I do recommend you see it.
But why?
The film is a nightmare, but not a cheap
effect nightmare that keeps riddling you with horrific visuals
and scary moments. No,
it is the worst kind of nightmare, the kind that lulls you into
a sense of quite peace, rocks you and coos you to sleep with the
simple sadness of life, throws in a lingering sense of despair
and a very, very background eeriness, that is almost
imperceptible most of the time, but sits in the back of your
mind, leaving you still a tad bit unsettled even as it lulls you
into a sense of calm.
Leading you very intimately into the main
character’s, Shigeharu’s, life, Miike introduces the story
of a man who’s wife has just died, taking us into the hospital
room as she passes. A young boy, his son walks in, and then we cut ahead seven
years. The boy is
14, living with his father and recommends he begin looking to
remarry. Shigeharu takes his advice.
A sweet story, right?
Kind of Sleepless in Seattle-ish, huh? |
|
I’m not big on explaining plot, that’s
what the movie is for, so that’s all I’ll give you, just a
taste of the calm sweetness that fills most of the first hour
and a half of this movie. And yet there’s something else, some other presence in the
film, some lurking darkness, even among the funnier and sadder
moments of the film, there’s something intensely evil present
and slowly it becomes clearer until a single scene, no more than
a minute long, about one hour into the film.
I would love to tell you the scene, but I
won’t. I believe
it is one of the single most frightening moments in cinema ever.
A moment so horrifically shocking and beautiful that,
even had I despised the film, would have made the purchase
worthwhile. I’ve
already watched the scene two more times.
|
 |
|
Throughout the first two hours of the film,
Miike gives you images, eerily framed, sometimes the picture
only a little square in the center of the screen, the rest pure
black, that are haunting for absolutely no reason you can put
your finger on. And
then they are gone, lost amidst more humanity, real life and
melancholy. Until
the next, when you again remember you are still somewhat
disturbed, despite the lull of the film.
Even after the astounding scene I just mentioned, Miike
manages to lull you again, a much harder job this time.
After awhile, the images stop being clear depictions, and
become a little more prevalent. A few times I wondered what I was looking at, what the
picture was, and yet still felt disturbed.
Even through the last frame, the melancholy
is present, though it ends up taking a backseat to absolute
horror. Here is
where the film isn’t for the weak stomached, here is where the
background discomfort and disturbance you’ve felt through the
whole film comes to bloom and overgrows the screen.
Here, also, is where the nightmare comes into it’s own,
where reality slips away, not into unreality, but, even worse,
into many realities, all horribly disjointed and possible.
Miike handles the surrealism of nightmares brilliantly,
twisting your mind with images that almost don’t go together,
scenes that are horrifically calm intermingled with images
absolutely awful. Images
begin mixing, reminiscent of Amenabar’s Abre Los Ojos (Open
your Eyes… and as a result, Crowe’s Vanilla Sky),
until the film is so surreal you know nothing for sure, except
that you are disgusted and confused.
After that the real horror begins.
Visually, the film is stunning, going from
a rather well done, but still pedestrian and typical story of a
depressed man missing his wife to a sensory attack so intense
it’s hard to get through.
Story-wise, the film plods a bit, not badly and in a way
it needs to, but takes some time to get to the punch line… and
it’s a punch line you won’t necessarily want it to reach. The slowness is necessary, strategic and well done, but slow
nonetheless, and the finale is horrific in ways our culture
doesn’t like its horror, and frankly can’t handle its
horror… and that’s probably a good thing.
But when the credits roll, you may find yourself uttering
a big fat, “Daf*ck?” wondering what it is you just saw, why
it was and how much of it really happened.
As time passes you will realize you were
supposed to feel that way.
The film is not neat in any way.
It’s a horror movie, in the ultimate sense of horror:
Horror is not some fantastic thing, it is real, and
reality won’t always make sense.
The horror of it usually doesn’t.
Miike wishes to leave you unsettled, uncomfortable,
unhappy and distraught. He
accomplishes all these things, intentionally knocking you out of
your lulled sense of calmness and into reality, where we might
not really be as clever, in control, and aware as we think are.
And were certainly aren’t as safe. |
|
|
This Movie Shouldn't Have
Gone Past the Audition
by Michael Flanagan
Pathetic
I love horror movies. I was there in the 80's for
each and every scary guy in a mask and/or needles sticking out of his face
movie ever released in a theater between 1984 and 1989, and some that
weren't. I've made a point to watch as many old Alfred Hitchcock
movies I can get my hands on. I've even watched some of the old
black and white "thing from space and/or toxic waste"
movies. None of this is to say I'm any kind of expert on horror, but
I know what scares me well, and this isn't it.
What makes horror, what makes scary movies, what makes
people cower in their seats with their arms wrapped around themselves,
eyes barely open, is, ironically, what you don't see. The absence of
a visible killer, or murder, or attack, or horrific event. There's a
reason we're all intrinsically scared of the dark: we don't know what's
there.
Audition is a very artistically done film, meaning
the shots are crafty, the story is atypical, and there is no real noticeable
formula, which could have more to do with the country of origin than the
actual originality of the creators. The problem is, you see all of
this. Audition, as a scary movie, fails to scare, and in the
meanwhile, fails to make a point. Unless, of course, the point is we
shouldn't completely trust strangers, and in that case, I saw a fifteen
minute film strip in the second grade that exemplifies that fact better
than this movie did. For instance: in once scene, a bag in the
background suddenly moves and growls like a demon. It's a nice,
scary moment in the movie, except it's a cheat. The growl was a
sound effect put there to make it a scarier moment, so the eventual payoff
doesn't...well, pay off.
The payoff. It's not so much scary as gory.
Blood and torture consume the last fifteen minutes, and it's pretty much a
waste. It serves to make for an uncomfortable moment, but it ends up
getting so pointlessly ridiculous that it skips any possible horror and
goes straight to humor. Sure, it's "boy I bet that hurts"
humor, but misplaced humor nonetheless.
I could go on, but the movie doesn't deserve much
more. Other than to say this: See John Carpenter's Halloween.
See Shyamalan's Signs. See Pet Semetary. Don't
bother with Audition.
|
| Awards
& Nominations: IMdb |
Full
Cast & Credits: IMdb |
| Links:
|
The Rumor Mill &
Trivia Section: IMdb
Do you have any trivia or rumors you'd like to
share?
|
| |
|