|
Highlander: Endgame
|
| Rated:
R |
2000 |
Color |
87
min. |
Awards |
|
|
| Starring: Adrian Paul, Christopher Lambert, Bruce Payne, Lisa Barbuscia, Donnie Yen, Adam Copeland, Ian Paul Cassidy, Jim Byrnes, Peter Wingfield, Damon Dash, Beatie Edney, Sheila Gish |
| Director:
Douglas Aarniokoski |
| Produced
by: Peter S.
Davis, William N. Panzer |
| Screen
Writer: Joel Soisson |
| Story
by: Gillian Horvath, William N. Panzer |
|
The Highlander: Endgame Store
|
| HugeReviews.com
Reviews:
A
New Beginning: Highlander Endgame
by Michael Flanagan
Solid
In the history of movies,
the act of “passing the torch” has rarely occurred without a glitch
or two. For instance, the
recent changeover in the Star Trek movie-universe, as the stars of the
televised “The Next Generation” took the stage from the classic
players, was met with Trekkie complaint after Trekkie complaint, and the
change’s device, “Star Trek Generations,” was met with an equal
amount of negative reviews. In
the case of the ever-continuing Highlander franchise, the changeover is
a little easier to accept, if not somewhat of a relief.
The third Highlander sequel, “Highlander:
Endgame” has the benefit of a worldwide successful television
series to counteract two miserable sequels. The
star of the series, Adrian Paul, is finally brought to the big screen in
a charismatic and charming performance as Duncan Macleod, the Scottish
Immortal and cousin to the previous Highlander driver, Christopher
Lambert’s Connor Macleod. Surprisingly,
the two actor’s have definite on-screen chemistry, and Paul’s
Scottish accent even adds character to Lambert’s constant monotone
attempts at clear English. The
only setback to this pairing is in the lack of screen time together.
Aside from one extremely well done and memorable sword fight (The
Cousins MacLeod vs. Wrestling’s Edge), the two are basically kept
apart with only moments of dialogue together, driven by a somewhat
average script.
The plot is the usual run-of-the-mill passing the buck story. Connor and Duncan face an extremely powerful immortal, Jakob
Kell, who has decided to ignore “the game” and use his eternity to
make Connor as miserable as possible.
We never see an example of Kell’s power, as many of the scenes
from the trailer were cut from the film, turning what appeared to be a
sorcerer into a really angry swordsman.
To say that Highlander Endgame is a wonderful film is easily a
stretch. It is, however,
the best sequel of the Highlander franchise, and it leaves the door open
for further Highlander’s, piloted by Adrian Paul’s charisma and,
unlike Lambert, actual acting ability.
Not only is Endgame a lot of fun for a Sunday afternoon, but also
leaves one with hope for the future of one of the best ideas in cinema.
Leave Highlander Endgame eagerly awaiting the new beginning, and,
as always, ready to come back for more.
[DVD
UPDATE]
The Highlander Endgame DVD adds much to the
film. First, it adds about 15 minutes to
the original film, which fills in some missing
plot points, adds a story arc, and makes it a
better movie. The extra are amazing;
they include deleted scenes, interesting
commentary (sans Aarniokoski),
and a featurette. The most unique aspect
is a "early cut" of the film, which
shows many deleted scenes (and lines) in a new
fashion, perhaps as the director originally
intended the film to be. The missing
scenes from the trailer, however, are still
nowhere to be seen.
Regardless of a missing director and a missing
trailer, the DVD is an excellent addition to
any collection. Average DVD Rank: Super.
DVD Rank for a Highlander fan? HUGE!
|
Using
the Mindlessness Angle: Highlander
4: Endgame
by Christian De Matteo
Solid
So, I was worried my commentary
on the first Highlander flick was going to upset some people,
just wait till you hear this.
I feel that Endgame was
a better movie than the first, despite the cameo of a WWF star Edge (watch
out for the corny WWF reference to his wrestling name: "Looks like
you've lost your EDGE").
I have a number of reasons for
feeling this way. First off, the sword fights were better, with
more special effects, more sparking swords, more acrobatics and more
stunts. As you know, you don't watch a Highlander flick for
plot, but for brainless fun. The final confrontation is a lot of
fun to watch, almost a poorman's Darth Maul finale, and very
enjoyable. Are you ever worried the hero won't make it? No,
but it sure does look cool.
Secondly, the story felt stronger,
less amateurish. Forgetting the second and third films (as the
series producers obviously have) the series has graduated from beginner
filmmaking, to successful TV movie status.. I suppose I consider
that an improvement, because at the least it felt more cohesive, more
thought out and the writing was better.
Thirdly, the villain wasn't
ridiculous, but evil. He was certainly not a brilliantly evil villain,
as smart as a Iago or as evil as a Joker, but he didn't make you want to
laugh as Clancy Brown's villain in the first film did. Bruce Payne
pulls off a performance in evil much like the Devil might act in a black
and white universe: unequivocally evil, and without any redeeming value
except maybe a cool sense of humor. This raises the stakes enough
to up the fun ante.
Fourthly, Lambert's acting has improved
(realize, this is a relative thing) and he works surprisingly well with
TV Highlander star Adrian Paul, who does a fine job with his
role. I can see why the fans grasped onto him in the TV
show. The interplay between the two of them through history gives
the film another dimension of fun as you get to see them training in all
different costumes and allowing for some funny flashbacks.
And this leads into the fifth
reason: Thanks to the TV show, the Highlander series has
learned not to take itself to seriously. This is good because they
can't really be taken seriously since there's no logical continuity in
the mythology at this point unless you ignore several entries. The
producers have smartly recognized that they are basically making fun
little sword and sorcery films and that that should be the end to the
formula. We the audience want swords, blood, action, explosions
and slapstick humor out of a Highlander movie.
And there is one more important
item we want from a Highlander movie: Sex. Yes,
sex. And this movie comes through on that angle beautifully,
topping (as opposed to tupping) part 1's enjoyable sex scene, by giving
us a two-time-periods-at-once sex scene, flashing back at forth for
double the nudity/double the fun, looks at the beautiful Lisa Barbuscia
(Almost Heros) in the throes of coital passion. And for
this I personally thank first time director Douglas Aarniokoski.
And these are my reasons for
considering this movie better than the first. Will I ever see this
again? Maybe if I'm ever too tired or sick to watch something of
substance and want some mindless fun, sure. I can't say that for
the first.
|
| |
| Awards:
Check back in 2001. |
|
But if he's the last, then whose this guy? And where did they
come from? If he died here, how could he be in the future
earlier...or is it..aw, ferget it! Confused? It might have
something to do with the fact that Highlander: Endgame completely
ignores the ending to the first Highlander film, as well as the whole
second and third film. Highlander continuity makes absolutely no
sense, so don't even bother trying! Just sit back and roll with
the punches, I guess. |
| |
|